<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sigma 500mm F4.5 EX DG HSM review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tobiashjorth.com/sigma-500mm-f45-ex-dg-hsm-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tobiashjorth.com/sigma-500mm-f45-ex-dg-hsm-review/</link>
	<description>Wildlife photographer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:34:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Evensen</title>
		<link>http://www.tobiashjorth.com/sigma-500mm-f45-ex-dg-hsm-review/comment-page-1/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Evensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobiashjorth.com/blog/?p=21#comment-651</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the answers. If it&#039;s as sharp as I think it is, a bit of cropping won&#039;t be too bad, though I do have a couple of old 2x converters to test it with, but they&#039;re all manual so I&#039;ll need an aperture ring, I guess it doesn&#039;t have that though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the answers. If it&#8217;s as sharp as I think it is, a bit of cropping won&#8217;t be too bad, though I do have a couple of old 2x converters to test it with, but they&#8217;re all manual so I&#8217;ll need an aperture ring, I guess it doesn&#8217;t have that though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobias</title>
		<link>http://www.tobiashjorth.com/sigma-500mm-f45-ex-dg-hsm-review/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobiashjorth.com/blog/?p=21#comment-603</guid>
		<description>Hi Alexander

I´m glad you found it useful!
I believe I didn´t notice any type of CA while using the lens. 
About the use with the 1.4x TC.
Well it depends on what body you´re using. I can´t say I´m an expert in Pentax since I really haven´t used one extensively but it you have a body that supports AF beyond F5.6 it will retain all connection and info between body and lens.

Tobias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alexander</p>
<p>I´m glad you found it useful!<br />
I believe I didn´t notice any type of CA while using the lens.<br />
About the use with the 1.4x TC.<br />
Well it depends on what body you´re using. I can´t say I´m an expert in Pentax since I really haven´t used one extensively but it you have a body that supports AF beyond F5.6 it will retain all connection and info between body and lens.</p>
<p>Tobias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Evensen</title>
		<link>http://www.tobiashjorth.com/sigma-500mm-f45-ex-dg-hsm-review/comment-page-1/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Evensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobiashjorth.com/blog/?p=21#comment-601</guid>
		<description>This looks very promising! It seems like I might be getting it, and I&#039;m looking forward to it. Good review!

Have you had any instances of CA or LoCA?

If you do what you mention to retain AF with a 1.4 teleconverter, do you lose the aperture information, or just retain AF? Do you know any teleconverters that would work on Pentax? Cause that&#039;s what I&#039;m using :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks very promising! It seems like I might be getting it, and I&#8217;m looking forward to it. Good review!</p>
<p>Have you had any instances of CA or LoCA?</p>
<p>If you do what you mention to retain AF with a 1.4 teleconverter, do you lose the aperture information, or just retain AF? Do you know any teleconverters that would work on Pentax? Cause that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m using <img src='http://www.tobiashjorth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobias</title>
		<link>http://www.tobiashjorth.com/sigma-500mm-f45-ex-dg-hsm-review/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 22:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobiashjorth.com/blog/?p=21#comment-552</guid>
		<description>Hi Rashed

Thank you for the comment.

Unfortunately I´m able to help you with the question because I don´t know the answer , although I could imagine it was the same. - Perhaps another one could supply you with the answer.
The 2.8mm sounds nice and incredibly wide :-)

Tobias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rashed</p>
<p>Thank you for the comment.</p>
<p>Unfortunately I´m able to help you with the question because I don´t know the answer , although I could imagine it was the same. &#8211; Perhaps another one could supply you with the answer.<br />
The 2.8mm sounds nice and incredibly wide <img src='http://www.tobiashjorth.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Tobias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rashed</title>
		<link>http://www.tobiashjorth.com/sigma-500mm-f45-ex-dg-hsm-review/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Rashed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 05:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobiashjorth.com/blog/?p=21#comment-551</guid>
		<description>You have mentioned about the use of TC-1.4, TC-2 and you mentioned that there is lose of focus with Sigma or Canon, is it different with Nikon, TC-1.4 or TC-1.7 ?

I am planning to buy the Sigma 500MM F4.5 to be as an addition to my Nikon F2.8MM VR which I just bought last October/

Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have mentioned about the use of TC-1.4, TC-2 and you mentioned that there is lose of focus with Sigma or Canon, is it different with Nikon, TC-1.4 or TC-1.7 ?</p>
<p>I am planning to buy the Sigma 500MM F4.5 to be as an addition to my Nikon F2.8MM VR which I just bought last October/</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobias</title>
		<link>http://www.tobiashjorth.com/sigma-500mm-f45-ex-dg-hsm-review/comment-page-1/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobiashjorth.com/blog/?p=21#comment-461</guid>
		<description>I suspect either the Kenko or the Canon would be the better choice. 

Tobias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect either the Kenko or the Canon would be the better choice. </p>
<p>Tobias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debapratim Saha</title>
		<link>http://www.tobiashjorth.com/sigma-500mm-f45-ex-dg-hsm-review/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Debapratim Saha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobiashjorth.com/blog/?p=21#comment-460</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tobias for your logical sugesstion,waiting for review results with 1.4x tc.....again ,which brand tc will result  the best?
Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tobias for your logical sugesstion,waiting for review results with 1.4x tc&#8230;..again ,which brand tc will result  the best?<br />
Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobias</title>
		<link>http://www.tobiashjorth.com/sigma-500mm-f45-ex-dg-hsm-review/comment-page-1/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobiashjorth.com/blog/?p=21#comment-459</guid>
		<description>To be honest with you I don´t think you´ll gain anything fungus wise by choosing a weather sealed lens. I believe fungus occur due to bad storage in moist conditions rather than use in harsh conditions. No weather sealing would help in this regard.
Therefore I suspect you could, like with any other lens that has been taken good care of, use it for your lifetime if that should be the case.
A friend of mine has one which is 6 or 7 years and it still looks and functions as new.

Tobias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest with you I don´t think you´ll gain anything fungus wise by choosing a weather sealed lens. I believe fungus occur due to bad storage in moist conditions rather than use in harsh conditions. No weather sealing would help in this regard.<br />
Therefore I suspect you could, like with any other lens that has been taken good care of, use it for your lifetime if that should be the case.<br />
A friend of mine has one which is 6 or 7 years and it still looks and functions as new.</p>
<p>Tobias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debapratim Saha</title>
		<link>http://www.tobiashjorth.com/sigma-500mm-f45-ex-dg-hsm-review/comment-page-1/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>Debapratim Saha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobiashjorth.com/blog/?p=21#comment-458</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tobias, what do you feel about the fungal affinity to its optics? Does weather sealing help in this regard ( as canon has)? If a lens get affected by fungas after cleaning (servicing), lens coat degrades...how do you compare  Sigma with canon in this respect? How long one can use this lens in good performance?  Actually I am planning to buy one...

Kind regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tobias, what do you feel about the fungal affinity to its optics? Does weather sealing help in this regard ( as canon has)? If a lens get affected by fungas after cleaning (servicing), lens coat degrades&#8230;how do you compare  Sigma with canon in this respect? How long one can use this lens in good performance?  Actually I am planning to buy one&#8230;</p>
<p>Kind regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobias</title>
		<link>http://www.tobiashjorth.com/sigma-500mm-f45-ex-dg-hsm-review/comment-page-1/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobiashjorth.com/blog/?p=21#comment-457</guid>
		<description>Hi Debapratim

I believe the only series the support autofocus past F5.6 is the 1d series which means you´ll have to do the tape trick.
Tobias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Debapratim</p>
<p>I believe the only series the support autofocus past F5.6 is the 1d series which means you´ll have to do the tape trick.<br />
Tobias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

